Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<040201c07fb9$f6449160$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	<cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References:	<kvk87wx4h4 DOT fsf_-_ AT vzell DOT de DOT oracle DOT com> <3A63CEBA DOT 6509B31 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3A643D02 DOT BCA1CC9C AT yahoo DOT com> <3A643F10 DOT 480F6601 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Subject:	Re: two differents version of unctrl.h, one in cygwin-1.1.7 and one in ncurses-5.2
Date:	Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:43:42 +1100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	16 Jan 2001 12:27:51.0980 (UTC) FILETIME=[BE98C6C0:01C07FB7]

What's done on *BSD and GNU/linux ?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Charles Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
To: "Earnie Boyd" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc: "Dr. Volker Zell" <Dr DOT Volker DOT Zell AT oracle DOT com>; <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: two differents version of unctrl.h, one in cygwin-1.1.7 and one in ncurses-5.2


> Earnie Boyd wrote:
> > 
> > Charles Wilson wrote:
> > >
> > > I'll release a new ncurses where the ncurses version of unctrl.h is
> > > renamed 'nunctrl.h' and change all internal ncurses references to point
> > > to the new file.  But I can't guarantee any time frame on that.
> > >
> > 
> > I don't know about the rest of this list but I would prefer it be
> > /usr/include/ncurses/unctrl.h.  It is then obvious as to what it is
> > for.  If you name it nunctrl.h then it won't be that obvious.
> 
> But if I do that, then where should all the other include files for
> ncurses go?  It's really odd for them to be split between /usr/include
> and /usr/include/ncurses/ .  However, ncurses is not like readline -- it
> doesn't like to install its header files into a subdirectory of
> /usr/include.  (e.g. the #include directives for most packages that
> depend on ncurses reference <curses.h>, not <ncurses/curses.h>.  This
> also goes for the ncurses header files themselves -- they
> inter-reference <foo.h>, not <ncurses/foo.h> or "foo.h".
> 
> --Chuck
> 
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> 
> 


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -