Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:58:18 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	Egor Duda <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: make -mno-win32 the gcc default?
Message-ID:	<20010111155818.C17041@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	Egor Duda <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20010110163107 DOT A4979 AT redhat DOT com> <3A5CDA12 DOT B7533F6C AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010110170527 DOT B21342 AT volta DOT certicom DOT com> <3A5CDEA3 DOT CAB59B71 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <171329197110 DOT 20010111103208 AT logos-m DOT ru> <3A5D6B3D DOT 48C2077F AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3A5E17B8 DOT FB338BAC AT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<3A5E17B8.FB338BAC@yahoo.com>; from earnie_boyd@yahoo.com on Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 03:29:44PM -0500

On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 03:29:44PM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>Charles Wilson wrote:
>> 
>> Egor Duda wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > Thursday, 11 January, 2001 Charles Wilson cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu wrote:
>> >
>> > CW> Sure.  'export CC="gcc -mwin32"' and 'export CXX="g++ -mwin32"' in your
>> > CW> .bashrc
>> >
>> > perhaps  we  should put
>> > 'export  CC="gcc -mno-win32"' and 'export CXX="g++ -mno-win32"' in our
>> > .bashrc's and live with it for some time before making it default?
>> >
>> > BTW, shouldn't it be
>> > 'export  CFLAGS="-mno-win32"' and 'export CXXFLAGS="-mno-win32"' ?
>> 
>> Yeah, you're probably right.  But lots of times I'll do this:
>> 
>
>No, he's wrong, IMO.  CC, CXX are the correct variables to set.  The
>reason is that CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS should be used for optimization and
>flags that are architecture independent while the architecture dependent
>flags should be passed with the CC, CXX variables.  This allows the
>configure script to use the architecture dependent flags in it's checks
>for what's available.  Otherwise, you might misconfigure the package.

Yes.  I think that Earnie is right here.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -