delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Message-ID: | <3A5CDA12.B7533F6C@ece.gatech.edu> |
Date: | Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:54:26 -0500 |
From: | Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.7 sun4u) |
X-Accept-Language: | en |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: make -mno-win32 the gcc default? |
References: | <20010110163107 DOT A4979 AT redhat DOT com> |
Christopher Faylor wrote: > > Earnie has been proposing this and I sort of like the idea but dread the > potential hue and cry that could result. > I also like the idea, but am terrified of the torrent of "It worked with gcc-2.95.2 and cygwin beta 1.1 [sic]" complaints. Also I'm not sure that all of "my" packages are _WIN32 clean. (For the most part, if they compiled -- I was happy. I didn't look too closely beyond that. I know that zlib and libpng are WIN32 clean 'cause I tested them with -mno-win32. Dunno *for sure* about the rest). > So, is the hue and cry from the lack of WIN32 counterbalanced by potentially > easier UNIX porting? Ummm....yyyyeeessss....I think???? --Chuck -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |