delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
"Charles S. Wilson" wrote: > > Earnie - > Apparently Zack tried to get something like this pushed into the > kernel, but for esoteric reasons beyond my ken the fix required by gcc > will break cygwin's fork(). That's why Zack is trying to roll his own > for gcc; gcc doesn't use fork(). > > See: > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2000-11/msg01475.html > and thread. > I'm sorry, I don't see where that message says that modifying mmap/munmap would break fork. The reference to fork was as an example of how it might be done. I appreciate the fact that Zack has looked at the Cygwin source, I still say that the effort would be best spent in the runtime, not a package workaround that may break in future runtime changes. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |