Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 8 Jan 2001 10:28:17 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [BUG] GCC specs ignored [WAS: Re: perl-5.6.1 DB_file support]
Message-ID:	<20010108102817.A27824@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3A5605B3 DOT AAC25D7F AT sbox DOT tu-graz DOT ac DOT at> <3A59255F DOT 85918DE8 AT sbox DOT tu-graz DOT ac DOT at> <3A5966E5 DOT 735999FE AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3A59C529 DOT 4342E4D4 AT yahoo DOT com> <3A59CEBF DOT FFC6B476 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3A59D593 DOT 32643717 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010108100138 DOT G26292 AT redhat DOT com> <3A59DB99 DOT 939BED59 AT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<3A59DB99.939BED59@yahoo.com>; from earnie_boyd@yahoo.com on Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:24:09AM -0500

On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:24:09AM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>If you are saying that gcc is somehow ignoring the specs file, then that
>>is a bug.
>
>Yes, I changed -mno-win32 to -mwin32 and received an error message from
>one of the subprocesses, I don't remember now if it was cpp or cc1, that
>it was an invalid switch.

Ok.  Nevermind.  It makes sense since -mwin32 has never been a valid switch.
You can't create new switches in the specs file, apparently.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -