| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
| From: | "Soren Andersen" <soren AT wonderstorm DOT com> |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Date: | Mon, 8 Jan 2001 08:37:03 -0500 |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Subject: | Re: dev/null |
| Reply-to: | soren AT wonderstorm DOT com |
| Message-ID: | <3A597C2F.29181.362977A9@localhost> |
| In-reply-to: | <20010107124950.A22232@redhat.com> |
| X-mailer: | Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) |
On 7 Jan 2001, an entity purporting to be Christopher Faylor
[Christopher Faylor <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>] wrote [regarding Re: dev/null]
soren:
>> But manually, I just use 'nul'.
Chris:
> /dev/null in cygwin eventually translates to the Windows NUL device.
I figured.
> There is no reason to use 'NUL' rather than '/dev/null' since they are
> both the same thing ... unless you enjoy using MS-DOS constructs rather than
> UNIX ones. That's sort of anti-Cygwin, though.
NO! NO! I am not anti-Cygwin ;-). I LUV Cygwin.
As a background general-knowledge sort of thing, I think its good to know
this. Allegory ... if you were stranded on a desert island with no way to buy
tiolet paper, would it be good to know how to make plant leaves very soft ..
? Someone might someday be working out a problem without Cygwin
around. I don't WISH it on them, but it could happen.
Cheers,
soren
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |