Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/01/01/19:14:04
Right. Perhaps as an attempt to clarify, the FAQ contains an entry on this
to discourage people who don't understand (or care) about the placement of
tools and the differences between Cygwin utilities and Win32/DOS versions
of the same name. If an individual is cognizant of these issues and
careful to avoid conflicts, one may install Cygwin anywhere, including the
root of any drive. Of course, if one decides to do this and later has some
troubles, its likely that any queries to this list will receive back the
suggestion of installing at the recommended location as a first step to
resolving the issue. This is simply because there are far too many possible
configurations and too few that can (or want to) help track problems like
this. Following this recommendation eliminates at least one variable and
will save the users in general possible problems. This has the added bonus
of limiting many user queries to the list about why Cygwin utilities in
c:\bin suddenly don't work after one installs MKS into c:\bin!;-)
Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com
RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com
118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX
At 06:57 PM 1/1/2001, Robert Collins wrote:
>Ah, so you see the future?
>
>Seriously, there are programs that CANNOT change where their files go and still operate - and when they collide with cygwin, goodbye
>cygwin | goodbye those programs.
>
>Are you saying the FAQ entry is wrong or misleading or hard to understand?
>
>I think it is accurate and the suggestion should be made as it is.
>I do not think it is misleading.
>Perhaps it could be clearer as to the reasons for the recommendation - do you have some suggested text to put there? (As I wasn't
>confused by it I am stumped with respect to understanding the confusion).
>
>Rob
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit DOT haase AT t-online DOT de>
>To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
>Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 8:42 AM
>Subject: Re: why not use root as root?
>
>
> > <1 Jan 2001, 14:20 Uhr wars, als Christopher Faylor folgendes schrub:>
> > < Re: why not use root as root? >
> >
> > > On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 05:02:36AM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > >Hash: SHA1
> > > >
> > > >Hi cygwinners,
> > > >
> > > >I found this entry in the faq:
> > > >
> > > >http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_4.html#SEC52
> > > >
> > > >So there is no explanation, what is the problem with that issue.
> > > >I only read, that it is not recommended, but why?
> > > >
> > > >'It is strongly recommended not to make the Cygwin root directory
> > > >the same as your drive's root directory, unless you know what you
> > > >are doing and are prepared to deal with the consequences. '
> > > >
> > > >What are the consequences?
> > >
> > > The consequences are discussed in the three sentences after the ones
> > > that you quoted. Please read the rest of the entry.
> > >
> >
> > :It is generally easier to maintain the Cygwin hierarchy if it is isolated from,
> > :say, C:\. For one thing, you avoid possible collisions with other (non-cygwin)
> > :applications that may create (for example) \bin and \lib directories.
> > :(Maybe you have nothing like that installed now, but who knows about things you
> > :might add in the future?)
> >
> > 'Generally...', and in special?
> > 'For one thing...', and the second one?
> > '...but who knows...', I know...!
> > --
> > =^..^=
> > Gerrit Peter Haase
> > ID: 0x28A05137
> > FP: 875C 745E 01CF 8A34 2767 BE39 305E 5261 28A0 5137
> >
> > --
> > Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> > Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> >
> >
>
>
>--
>Want to unsubscribe from this list?
>Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -