Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<00c701c0744e$9aa35380$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	<gerrit DOT haase AT t-online DOT de>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<3A500F6C DOT 31974 DOT 15EDFBC2 AT localhost>; from gerrit DOT haase AT t-online DOT de on Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 05:02:36AM +0100 <3A5107CF DOT 875 DOT 19B83E91 AT localhost>
Subject:	Re: why not use root as root?
Date:	Tue, 2 Jan 2001 10:57:29 +1100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

Ah, so you see the future?

Seriously, there are programs that CANNOT change where their files go and still operate - and when they collide with cygwin, goodbye
cygwin | goodbye those programs.

Are you saying the FAQ entry is wrong or misleading or hard to understand?

I think it is accurate and the suggestion should be made as it is.
I do not think it is misleading.
Perhaps it could be clearer as to the reasons for the recommendation - do you have some suggested text to put there? (As I wasn't
confused by it I am stumped with respect to understanding the confusion).

Rob

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit DOT haase AT t-online DOT de>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: why not use root as root?


> <1 Jan 2001, 14:20 Uhr wars, als Christopher Faylor folgendes schrub:>
> < Re: why not use root as root? >
>
> > On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 05:02:36AM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > >Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > >Hi cygwinners,
> > >
> > >I found this entry in the faq:
> > >
> > >http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_4.html#SEC52
> > >
> > >So there is no explanation, what is the problem with that issue.
> > >I only read, that it is not recommended, but why?
> > >
> > >'It is strongly recommended not to make the Cygwin root directory
> > >the same as your drive's root directory, unless you know what you
> > >are doing and are prepared to deal with the consequences. '
> > >
> > >What are the consequences?
> >
> > The consequences are discussed in the three sentences after the ones
> > that you quoted.  Please read the rest of the entry.
> >
>
> :It is generally easier to maintain the Cygwin hierarchy if it is isolated from,
> :say, C:\. For one thing, you avoid possible collisions with other (non-cygwin)
> :applications that may create (for example) \bin and \lib directories.
> :(Maybe you have nothing like that installed now, but who knows about things you
> :might add in the future?)
>
> 'Generally...', and in special?
> 'For one thing...', and the second one?
> '...but who knows...', I know...!
> --
> =^..^=
> Gerrit Peter Haase
> ID: 0x28A05137
> FP: 875C 745E 01CF 8A34 2767  BE39 305E 5261 28A0 5137
>
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>
>


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -