Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From:	"Andre Oliveira da Costa" <costa AT cade DOT com DOT br>
To:	"Cygwin" <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Static version of Cygwin DLL?
Date:	Thu, 28 Dec 2000 16:01:11 -0200
Message-ID:	<002901c070f8$296e2ae0$ab00000a@costa>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance:	Normal
In-Reply-To:	<3995C58A11F7D211A7EE00105AC580984ACEA5@BE-BRU-EXCH-2>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600

Hi everybody,

thanks for all the posts. Now I understand that, even if there was a
libcygwin1.a, linking statically to it could bring me licensing problems. I
also learnt that, if I'm ok with dropping POSIX, I could use the -mno-cygwin
switch (in this case, I'd be Cygwin license-compliant, right?). I guess that
covers it all.

Thank you all for your time.

Best,

Andre Costa

> Maybe this could be an acceptable workaround:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 02:26:49AM -0600, Pirot, Thierry wrote:
> >http://www.xraylith.wisc.edu/~khan/software/gnu-win32/mno-cygwin-
> howto.txt
> >
> >hope this help,
>
> I don't think it will.  This document tells you how to build an
> application that does not rely on cygwin in any way.  Unless I'm missing
> something, this is not what was being asked for.
>
> The real answer is "You can't do that.  Sorry."
>
> cgf


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -