delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/12/21/09:27:23

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <17B78BDF120BD411B70100500422FC6309E1A1@IIS000>
From: Bernard Dautrevaux <Dautrevaux AT microprocess DOT com>
To: "'Earnie Boyd'" <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>,
"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>,
cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: documentation archive
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 15:05:50 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 5:11 PM
> To: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc); cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: documentation archive
> 
> 
> --- "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com> wrote:
> > At 10:49 AM 12/20/2000, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> > >--- Bernard Dautrevaux <Dautrevaux AT microprocess DOT com> wrote:
> > > > Why not switch to the quite common ".tgz" suffix 
> instead of .tar.gz" and
> > > > replace dots in release numbers by underscores? this 
> could be done almost
> > > > unambiguously (at least as long as package names do not 
> contain '-'):
> > > > 
> > >
> > >Yuck!!  Not worth it.
> > 
> > 
> > I'm not sure I understand this reaction.  To be honest, I 
> think simple 
> > permutation in form that addresses the inevitable queries 
> to the list 
> > regarding the problem of name-mangling by browsers a "good 
> thing"(tm) (of 
> > course one could argue that the browsers need to be 
> fixed!;-)).  This idea 
> > seems to be focused toward that goal.  Logistics of making 
> this change aside,
> > 
> > is there a reason this would NOT be a good idea?  Just curious...
> > 
> 
> Yes, the browsers should be fixed and the most recent version 
> of Netscape
> Communicator doesn't mangle the names any more.  There are 
> other reasons
> besides name mangling, such as, file content mangling that 
> alwo happens.  If
> the browser doesn't understand the extention then it 
> downloads in text mode. 
> So, it's not worth changing the name.

Are you sure of that ? I was thinking that unrecognized files were always
transfered as binary data and BTW, I'm not sure that IE5 has any knowledge
of a '.gz' suffix :-)

Note that as windows FTP client are concerned they effectively try to use
the suffix to choose between binary and text format while UNIX clients
ususally ALWAYS use text format unless explicitely directed to binary mode
:-)

Regards,

	Bernard

--------------------------------------------
Bernard Dautrevaux
Microprocess Ingenierie
97 bis, rue de Colombes
92400 COURBEVOIE
FRANCE
Tel:	+33 (0) 1 47 68 80 80
Fax:	+33 (0) 1 47 88 97 85
e-mail:	dautrevaux AT microprocess DOT com
		b DOT dautrevaux AT usa DOT net
-------------------------------------------- 

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019