Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id:	<4.3.1.2.20001220105200.027665d0@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Sender:	lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date:	Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:59:03 -0500
To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From:	"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
Subject:	RE: AW: AW: AW: documentation archive
In-Reply-To:	<20001220154912.18117.qmail@web110.yahoomail.com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 10:49 AM 12/20/2000, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>--- Bernard Dautrevaux <Dautrevaux AT microprocess DOT com> wrote:
> > Why not switch to the quite common ".tgz" suffix instead of .tar.gz" and
> > replace dots in release numbers by underscores? this could be done almost
> > unambiguously (at least as long as package names do not contain '-'):
> > 
>
>Yuck!!  Not worth it.


I'm not sure I understand this reaction.  To be honest, I think simple 
permutation in form that addresses the inevitable queries to the list 
regarding the problem of name-mangling by browsers a "good thing"(tm) (of 
course one could argue that the browsers need to be fixed!;-)).  This idea 
seems to be focused toward that goal.  Logistics of making this change aside, 
is there a reason this would NOT be a good idea?  Just curious...


Larry



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -