Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3A3F911D.5CBF4066@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:47:25 -0500
From:	"Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: CVS permissions problem with network drive
References:	<OF4452111B DOT B0F21FC3-ON862569B2 DOT 00610F4F AT mmm DOT com> <013901c06960$9ff3dd30$ad9560cb AT workhorse> <20001218214202 DOT A5253 AT redhat DOT com> <0012191352330A DOT 28008 AT cygbert> <20001219111041 DOT A8423 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> Actually, shouldn't this be a mount option rather than a cygwin setting?
> In fact, maybe a
> 
> mount -n c:\foo /foo    # use NTSEC semantics
> 
> would be sort of nice.

Yes, it would.  But, how would 

cp foo //bar/baz

be hamdled?  Besides, this is something you'd configure one way or the
other for all SMB shares -- either you're a domain user or you're not. 
So, it probably shouldn't be set on a per-share or per-mount basis, but
rather it should be set globally for a particular user/installation.  

--Chuck

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -