delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Date: | Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:10:41 -0500 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: CVS permissions problem with network drive |
Message-ID: | <20001219111041.A8423@redhat.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <OF4452111B DOT B0F21FC3-ON862569B2 DOT 00610F4F AT mmm DOT com> <013901c06960$9ff3dd30$ad9560cb AT workhorse> <20001218214202 DOT A5253 AT redhat DOT com> <0012191352330A DOT 28008 AT cygbert> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.11i |
In-Reply-To: | <0012191352330A.28008@cygbert>; from cygwin@cygwin.com on Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 01:52:33PM +0100 |
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 01:52:33PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Tuesday 19 December 2000 03:42, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:08:45PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote: >> >----- Original Message ----- >> >From: "Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> >> >To: "Corinna Vinschen" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> >> > >> >> Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Sounds reasonable to me. CYGWIN=smbfakeperm ? CYGWIN=nodomain ? >> > >> >CYGWIN=SMBisBroken ? >> >> CYGWIN=ilikepie ? >> >> Nah. Too much of a possibility of misinterpretation. > >I know, this is somewhat dry but I have decided to use [no]smbntsec. > >What I'm curious about is what do you think should be the default? >Personally I would prefer to have smbntsec off by default but to >have it on by default would match the current behaviour. > >Opinions? Actually, shouldn't this be a mount option rather than a cygwin setting? In fact, maybe a mount -n c:\foo /foo # use NTSEC semantics would be sort of nice. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |