Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:03:34 +0300
From:	Egor Duda <deo AT logos-m DOT ru>
X-Mailer:	The Bat! (v1.45) Personal
Reply-To:	Egor Duda <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Organization:	DEO
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<95347803745.20001219100334@logos-m.ru>
To:	"Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
CC:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: [Fwd: [21.1] work around cygwin readlink bug]
In-reply-To:	<3A3EA9F2.E626B2B@ece.gatech.edu>
References:	<3A3EA9F2 DOT E626B2B AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0

Hi!

Tuesday, 19 December, 2000 Charles S. Wilson cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu wrote:

CSW> Saw this message on the xemacs-nt mailing list.  Is this a known bug in
CSW> cygwin-1.1.6 ?

readlink() behavior was discussed in this thread

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2000-q3/msg00050.html

i  believe  that  now  cygwin's readlink() complies with all standards
mentioned in that thread.

my  initial  patch  contained a stupid bug (i've used max() instead of
min()), wich was later corrected by Chris.

Egor.            mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -