Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From:	M4um AT aol DOT com
Message-ID:	<ad.47b77f1.276f9f03@aol.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 12:10:27 EST
Subject:	Re: #includes not being processed across network
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
CC:	lhall AT rfk DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Windows AOL sub 109

Dear Sir: 

In response to:

>>Found: D:\Cygwin\bin\sh.exe
>>Warning: d:\BIN\sh.exe hides D:\Cygwin\bin\sh.exe
>>Found: \bin\sh.exe
>>Warning: d:\BIN\sh.exe hides \bin\sh.exe

>Its not at all obvious that d:\bin\sh.exe is equivalent to 
>d:\Cygwin\bin\sh.exe.  Is it?  If so, for maintainability reasons,
>I'd recommend either using a mount or symbolic link or something to 
>get a sh.exe into /bin.

The two copies of sh.exe are identical.  You'll note my comment in the stream 
immediately after your comment which says: "(***NOTE: The two copies of 
sh.exe above are identical.)"

Until I get the compiler working across the net, I am avoiding the use of 
links just to make sure that they don't complicate the problem.

Thanks,
John McDonald

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -