delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Date: | Sat, 16 Dec 2000 12:35:37 -0500 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> |
To: | cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Cc: | s_kelem AT pacbell DOT net |
Subject: | Re: latest version of gcc? |
Message-ID: | <20001216123537.A31046@redhat.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, s_kelem AT pacbell DOT net |
References: | <3A3BA5BF DOT 5080009 AT pacbell DOT net> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.11i |
In-Reply-To: | <3A3BA5BF.5080009@pacbell.net>; from s_kelem@pacbell.net on Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 09:26:23AM -0800 |
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 09:26:23AM -0800, Steve Kelem wrote: >I looked around the cygwin site and couldn't find an obvious answer to >this question.... > >What's the latest version of gcc that I should be using with the latest >cygwin (1.1.6)? > >The Cygwin page has a "more software" link that points to gcc.2.95.2 >that was built in 1999. Is that the latest one that I should be using? I don't understand the question. We include a version of gcc when you install cygwin. Why would you assume that this version was incorrect? cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |