Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 02:05:50 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [long] Re: signals?
Message-ID:	<20001212020549.A29632@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<5 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 25 DOT 0 DOT 20001211202412 DOT 02930eb0 AT pop DOT bresnanlink DOT net> <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 0 DOT 20001113000139 DOT 00c3ba60 AT pop DOT bresnanlink DOT net> <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 0 DOT 20001001212519 DOT 00c09bb0 AT pop> <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 0 DOT 20001001212519 DOT 00c09bb0 AT pop> <20001002114023 DOT H13304 AT cygnus DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 0 DOT 20001113000139 DOT 00c3ba60 AT pop DOT bresnanlink DOT net> <20001113115655 DOT J7424 AT redhat DOT com> <5 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 25 DOT 0 DOT 20001211202412 DOT 02930eb0 AT pop DOT bresnanlink DOT net> <20001212002741 DOT D22048 AT redhat DOT com> <5 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 25 DOT 0 DOT 20001211233737 DOT 02885010 AT pop DOT bresnanlink DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<5.0.0.25.0.20001211233737.02885010@pop.bresnanlink.net>; from cabbey@bresnanlink.net on Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 12:54:02AM -0600

On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 12:54:02AM -0600, Chris Abbey wrote:
>At 00:27 12/12/00 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 11:21:05PM -0600, Chris Abbey wrote:
>> >At 11:56 11/13/00 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >>Dunno.  Probably, you're sending more than one CTRL-BREAK.  It works
>> >>fine for me.
>> >>
>> >>cgf
>> >
>> >ok, I'd ask that you (and anyone else with a couple minutes) humor me
>>
>>If the "you" here is me, then I respectfully decline.
>
>it was, (the parenthetical was for anyone else) primarily because
>you claim this works for you, and I see no way in hell it can.
>I respectfully deduce then that you claim "wfm" without actually
>having ever tried it...

Now you're just being insulting.

I guess I will stop reading this thread now.

Bye, bye,
cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -