Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 6 Dec 2000 19:10:52 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin support <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Checking for 95 vs. NT at runtime
Message-ID:	<20001206191052.D11348@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin support <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20001206142217 DOT 02101860 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <3A2E8EBA DOT 5EEB6BA3 AT sattel DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20001206142217 DOT 02101860 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20001206143908 DOT 02110758 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <3A2ED3EE DOT 5E8243A4 AT sattel DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<3A2ED3EE.5E8243A4@sattel.com>; from bedge@sattel.com on Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 04:03:58PM -0800

On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 04:03:58PM -0800, Bruce Edge wrote:
>Can you tell from the cygwin API whether you're running under NT or 95?
>
>I saw the thread that contained:
>
>  if (! is_winnt)
>    {
>      ...your w9x specific code...
>    }
>
>The definition of is_winnt is used eg. in `cygwin_utils.c':
>
>#define is_winnt       (GetVersion() < 0x80000000)
>
>but GetVersion is undefined.

No, it isn't.  I don't know why you would think that this is undefined
but it is not.

You do have to include the header file which defines it, though, which
would probably be <windows.h>.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -