Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id:	<4.3.1.2.20001206142401.00b980f8@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Sender:	lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date:	Wed, 06 Dec 2000 14:26:25 -0500
To:	Charles Krug <charles AT pentek DOT com>, Cygwin <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
From:	"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Reproduced it finally
In-Reply-To:	<20001206142244.B17614@pentek.com>
References:	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20001206140123 DOT 020ffc00 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20001206122555 DOT 020e0bd0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
	<20001206094141 DOT D17209 AT pentek DOT com>
	<20001204203948 DOT 9541 DOT qmail AT web117 DOT yahoomail DOT com>
	<20001204181002 DOT C14648 AT pentek DOT com>
	<20001204182503 DOT C28620 AT redhat DOT com>
	<20001206094141 DOT D17209 AT pentek DOT com>
	<20001206121754 DOT E17209 AT pentek DOT com>
	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20001206122555 DOT 020e0bd0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
	<20001206133231 DOT A17614 AT pentek DOT com>
	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20001206140123 DOT 020ffc00 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 02:22 PM 12/6/2000, Charles Krug wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 02:03:45PM -0500, cygwin-return-20010-charles=pentek DOT com AT sources DOT redhat DOT com wrote:
> > 
> > I'm guessing (only!) that the environment is somehow getting trashed in
> > some nested invocation.  That could explain the behavior.  I can't say 
> > that's it though...
> > 
>
>Could it be that the nested invocations are running out of environment
>space?  I'm not even sure if that's possible under NT, or what the
>difference is that makes Win95 work, unless they default to vastly
>different settings.
>
>
>Charles



Running out of space on NT is not likely to be the problem but corruption of
the environment space might.  Still, this is only a theory which is just
another word for speculation.  Speculation fixes nothing.  It needs to be
tracked down.  But this may be a starting point...



Larry



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -