Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id:	<4.3.1.2.20001206142217.02101860@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Sender:	lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date:	Wed, 06 Dec 2000 14:23:29 -0500
To:	Bruce Edge <bedge AT sattel DOT com>, cygwin support <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
From:	"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
Subject:	Re: O_NONBLOCK serial I/O blocks on 95, OK on NT
In-Reply-To:	<3A2E8EBA.5EEB6BA3@sattel.com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 02:08 PM 12/6/2000, Bruce Edge wrote:
>I'm opening /dev/com1 as follows:
>  fd  = open( "/dev/com1", O_RDWR | O_NOCTTY | O_NONBLOCK | O_BINARY ); 
>
>on NT the O_NONBLOCK works fine.
>on win 95, read( fd, buf, max_len ) blocks.
>
>I don't think the termios stuff should affect this, at least if it did, I
>should be having the same problem under NT.
>Is there a fix for this?
>Or, is there any way to check for chars pending before reading?
>I'm already using select(), which shouldn't even drop out of the wait until
>there's data.


Perhaps this is related to this?

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2000-11/msg01544.html

If so, you may find some insight by reading this thread...






Larry Hall                              lhall AT rfk DOT com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      http://www.rfk.com
118 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746                     (508) 893-9889 - FAX



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -