delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Date: | Tue, 5 Dec 2000 19:19:00 -0500 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Re: Web2C: CYGWIN is not DOSISH] |
Message-ID: | <20001205191900.A16709@redhat.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <20001205223034 DOT 3092 DOT qmail AT web108 DOT yahoomail DOT com> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.11i |
In-Reply-To: | <20001205223034.3092.qmail@web108.yahoomail.com>; from earnie_boyd@yahoo.com on Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 02:30:34PM -0800 |
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 02:30:34PM -0800, Earnie Boyd wrote: >--- Jerome Benoit <JGMBenoit AT Wanadoo DOT fr> wrote: >> >> I have tried it: for Web2C CYGWIN is not DOSISH (it does not work if one >> assume this) >> > >It is known that Cygwin == UNIX. > >> But it seems that `ls C:\\WINDOWS' works ! >> So accordingly `ls' is DOSIH >> hence the trouble. > >A benefit of the underlying OS. You will also find that `ls c:/windows' also >works as well as `ls /cygdrive/c/windows' and if you have c:/ mounted to point >/c then `ls /c/windows' will also work. Just in case this isn't obvious, Cygwin operates correctly with DOS-style path names. This isn't an accident. We do allow native path specifications. The term "DOSISH" is not some universally understood and recognized term that is applied to things like "ls". The term is used in Perl and, apparently, in Web2C to indicate that the underlying OS looks like DOS. Whether it is appropriate to define "DOSISH" in a package is entirely up to the package. It has nothing to do with Cygwin per se. Again, DOSISH is not a term that people "in the know" bandy amongst themselves. We don't all look at each other and shake our heads knowingly saying "Ah yes, Cygwin is... DOSISH!" DOSISH is just a definition with a specific meaning for a specific package. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |