Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:31:25 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	Cygnus <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc:	JGMBenoit AT Wanadoo DOT fr
Subject:	Re: [Fwd: Re: Web2C: CYGWIN is not DOSISH]
Message-ID:	<20001205163125.A15647@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	Cygnus <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, JGMBenoit AT Wanadoo DOT fr
References:	<3A2D5CCF DOT 9030004 AT Wanadoo DOT fr>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<3A2D5CCF.9030004@Wanadoo.fr>; from JGMBenoit@Wanadoo.fr on Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 10:23:27PM +0100

On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 10:23:27PM +0100, Jerome Benoit wrote:
> > I have done some fix in view to build web2c-7.3.3 under cygwn-1.1:
> > the main idea is that  CYGWIN is _NOT_ DOSISH
>
>Is CYGWIN supposed to understand DOS-style pathnames (e.g, C:\dir)?
>If so, then it definetely is DOSISH.  If not, then the DOSISH support
>can be safely removed.
>
>-- 
>Olaf Weber

Gawd, how could anyone *possibly* know the answer to that question?  I
mean, how could you figure out anything that complex???

You'd actually have to try it or something.

Brrr...   Scary...

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -