Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id:	<4.3.1.2.20001122152436.02106e20@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Sender:	lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date:	Wed, 22 Nov 2000 15:25:29 -0500
To:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
From:	"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
Subject:	Re: newbie: Out of order execution in script
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<200011222018.PAA32341@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20001122150913 DOT 020f6e18 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
	<OF9D8082CB DOT EC2181DD-ON8525699F DOT 006539D4 AT gdls DOT com>
	<OF9D8082CB DOT EC2181DD-ON8525699F DOT 006539D4 AT gdls DOT com>
	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20001122150913 DOT 020f6e18 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 03:18 PM 11/22/2000, DJ Delorie wrote:

> > I guess I'm confused as to why one should expect things exec'd to run in 
> > a certain sequence.  Isn't that the point of execing?  If you're going to 
>
>You're thinking of fork() (or perhaps spawn()).  What exec() does is
>replace the current process with a new one, which obviously must be
>done in the right sequence ;)

Yikes!  Gotta read the email more carefully!;-)






Larry



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -