delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Date: | Mon, 20 Nov 2000 17:13:05 -0500 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> |
To: | Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.3 on Cygwin 1.1.5 |
Message-ID: | <20001120171305.A10949@redhat.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
References: | <20001120140411 DOT I370 AT dothill DOT com> <20001120142118 DOT B7398 AT redhat DOT com> <20001120170601 DOT A439 AT dothill DOT com> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.11i |
In-Reply-To: | <20001120170601.A439@dothill.com>; from Jason.Tishler@dothill.com on Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 05:06:01PM -0500 |
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 05:06:01PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: >On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 02:21:18PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 02:04:11PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: >>>Attached is a PostgreSQL 7.0.3 on Cygwin 1.1.5 patch. It is an update >>>to the PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 3) patch. Note that this >>>patch still incorporates Pete's 10/26/2000 patch: >>> >>> http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-ports/2000-10/msg00066.html >> > >>>Please use it instead of the older PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 patches. >> >>It would be nice if we started using the cygwin-apps mailing list for >>this kind of stuff. cygwin-apps has a lot of subscribers but almost >>zero traffic. > >Sorry for the noise. The "by-approval" nature of cygwin-apps assisted >in my laziness. I will apply for approval and if accepted, then I will >post to cygwin-apps instead of cygwin for "this kind of stuff." I wasn't complaining. I was just musing. I would never complain to anyone who posted a patch and was obviously working on improving things rather than speculating on how things could be improved. I honestly was wondering if cygwin-apps was useful. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |