Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3A147433.1006AF12@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Thu, 16 Nov 2000 18:56:35 -0500
From:	"Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: [avail for test] xpm-4.0.0-1
References:	<3A0A39FD DOT 7C5A57C8 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>

Since I had no error reports from testing of this package, and my own
tests showed that it works fine, I am going to remove the 'test'
designator on xpm-4.0.0-1.  Any objections?

--Chuck

P.S. I asked for comments on the point quoted below, but received none. 
I suppose everyone agrees with my reasoning?

> o PLEASE comment: the dll's are versioned as "4", not "3" -- but this is
> NOT because the sources came from XFree86- ***4*** .0.0.  According to
> xpm.h, the library version number, which remains "3.4k" even in the
> XFree86-4.0.0 sources, should be parsed as follows:
>    XpmFormat "3"
>    XpmVersion "4"
>    XpmRevision "11" ( "k" is the 11th letter of the alphabet )
> Quoting: "we forget the 3 which is the format number" so the SO version
> is 4.11 (which I simplified down to just SOMAJOR = 4 ).  Did I do the
> right thing in using "4" as the dll version number?

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -