Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 15 Nov 2000 14:45:51 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Can cygwin be used on windows 2000 ?
Message-ID:	<20001115144551.B15937@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20001115122349 DOT 00b89b00 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <3A12E0AF DOT B2A7AFE4 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<3A12E0AF.B2A7AFE4@redhat.com>; from vinschen@redhat.com on Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 08:14:55PM +0100

On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 08:14:55PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
>> 
>> At 12:16 PM 11/15/2000, Bishop Chad-QCB004 wrote:
>> >Can cygwin be used on windows 2000 ?
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Chad Bishop
>> 
>> Yes.
>> 
>> Any chance that we could get the FAQ and/or the main Cygwin home page updated
>> to mention W2K too?
>
>Do you know the next question? It's: "The FAQ mentions that Cygwin
>works on Windows 2000 but did somebody really try it?"
>
>Personally I wonder why so many people ask that question instead of
>simply trying it.

And, why would anyone assume that it *doesn't* work?  Windows 2000 isn't exactly
new anymore.  I could understand questions about Windows Me, but not Windows 2000.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -