Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sat, 11 Nov 2000 23:00:58 -0500 (EST)
From:	Stephen L Moshier <moshier AT mediaone DOT net>
X-Sender:	moshier AT moshier DOT ne DOT mediaone DOT net
Reply-To:	moshier AT mediaone DOT net
To:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
cc:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: long double support in cygwin
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.20.0011112221130.2423-100000@moshier.ne.mediaone.net>
MIME-Version:	1.0

>>A search of the mailing list archive turned up what looks like
>>another attempt to offer long double functions, over a year ago,
>>as a version of mathinline.h.  Did that work lead anywhere?
>
>Not that I'm aware of.  I don't recall anyone submitting any code.

The posting was by Tim Prince.  If you told him what you just
told me, to go talk to newlib, then I suppose he would not have
submitted any code to you.  But I don't see it in newlib either.


> As to why it's not there, it's not there because no one has
> implemented it.

I don't think that explains it.
You could have copied the implementations from the old linux libc,
glibc 1 or 2 libraries, from libio, from gmp, or from DJGPP.  The printf
in newlib is BSD.  That has previously been modified for long double
support in linux libc 4, as a contributed item for DJGPP and, one would
think, by BSD as well.  Why aren't you using any of these six
or seven codes that various people have indeed implemented?
What is the policy?


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -