Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/11/10/16:43:45
"Masterson, Dave" wrote:
> > 544 is the admins group.
>
> Ok, I see that now from the documentation. However, what governs the
> permissions on the file?
Under NT? The permissions set on the parent directory. But this
is really MS documentation.
> > If ntsec is off, the ownership might be faked dependent of the
> > contents of /etc/passwd.
>
> How? Does it simply assume that all files are owned by the current user
> (ie. leave it to Windows to arbitrate access to the file)?
Sorry, wrong description. On NTFS it always uses the RID then which
is substituted by a name in `ls -l' output iff /etc/passwd has a
corresponding user entry.
On FAT it always assums the current user is the owner regardless
of the ntsec setting.
> > myadmingrp::544:513:,S-1-5-32-544::/bin/false
>
> I thought mkpasswd (without "-s") would do this by default (but "root"
> instead of "myadmingrp").
> [...]
> > > BTW, mkpasswd and mkgroup did not make the "root" account/group
>
> > Sure. They are not intended to do it by themselves. It's _your_
> > choice.
>
> By my choice, do you mean my choice for adding "-s" to the command line? Or
> do you mean that mkpasswd doesn't add these accounts at all and its my
> choice to add them by hand?
mkpasswd didn't that up to Cygwin-1.1.5-4, it does from 1.1.5-6 on.
But it _never_ uses another login name than the one which is given
by the NT system (locale dependent). If you want that Cygwin sees
admins as root, _you_ have to change the name like the aforementioned
`myadmingrp' example.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.
mailto:vinschen AT redhat DOT com
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
- Raw text -