Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Envelope-Sender-Is:	Andrej DOT Borsenkow AT mow DOT siemens DOT ru (at relayer david.siemens.de)
From:	"Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej DOT Borsenkow AT mow DOT siemens DOT ru>
To:	"Rick Rankin" <rick_rankin AT yahoo DOT com>,
	"Larry Hall \(RFK Partners, Inc\)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>,
	"Cygwin" <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Some domain groups not found by 'mkgroup --domain'
Date:	Wed, 8 Nov 2000 22:19:21 +0300
Message-ID:	<002e01c049b8$cc0c6b70$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
In-Reply-To:	<20001108175230.6488.qmail@web801.mail.yahoo.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
> [mailto:cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com]On Behalf Of Rick Rankin
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 8:53 PM
> To: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc); Cygwin
> Subject: Re: Some domain groups not found by 'mkgroup --domain'
>
>
> No, these groups are different. They are domain groups, yet there
> seems to be a
> distinction between a "global" domain group and a "local" domain
> group. These
> "local" domain groups do not show up with either 'mkgroup -d' or
> 'mkgroup -l'.
>
> Sorry, I should have been more specific.
>

Can you provide an example? To my best knowledge, such thing simply does not
exist (in NT4 domain, that is). You have users and groups defined on domain
controller(s) - they are global, domain-wide. And you have users and groups
defined on domain member(s) - they are local _for_each_member_.

If have NT workstation A and B they have different "local" groups (even with
the same names). May be, you mean these?

-andrej


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -