Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Envelope-Sender-Is:	helmut DOT dipper AT sicad DOT de (at relayer david.siemens.de)
Message-ID:	<3A0966F3.34F75B3D@sicad.de>
Date:	Wed, 08 Nov 2000 15:45:07 +0100
From:	Helmut Dipper <helmut DOT dipper AT sicad DOT de>
Organization:	SICAD Utilities
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.7 sun4m)
X-Accept-Language:	en,de
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	missing inheritance of exported shell function

I use following bash-version:

bash -version delivers:
GNU bash, version 2.04.0(1)-release (i586-pc-cygwin)
Copyright 1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

on Windows-NT 4.0 SP5.

During my tests I found following behaviour:

Given the definitions

VAR="xxx" ; export VAR
function fct() { pwd; } ; export -f fct

Consider the environments of subsequent started shells:

- interactive shell "bash"
  variable VAR and function fct are inherited

- interactive shell "sh" or
  shell-script with #!/bin/sh or
  shell-script with #!/bin/bash
  variable VAR is inherited but not function fct

Question:
Why is there a difference in the inheritance between
variables and functions?

Regards
Helmut Dipper

-- 
Helmut Dipper			| SICAD Utilities GmbH
phone: +49 89 636 41558	| Otto-Hahn-Ring 6
___fax: +49 89 636 49613 | D-81730 Muenchen

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -