Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 1 Nov 2000 13:46:21 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: 1.1.4, select, and SIGCHLD
Message-ID:	<20001101134621.N14818@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
References:	<20001101165236 DOT 4513 DOT qmail AT web1306 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To:	<20001101165236.4513.qmail@web1306.mail.yahoo.com>; from robert_fidler@yahoo.com on Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 08:52:36AM -0800

On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 08:52:36AM -0800, Robert Fidler wrote:
>I am seeing behavior where a daemon process has multiple children die
>'simultaneously' and subsequent calls to select() consistently return
>-1 immediately with errno set to EINTR.  This puts the daemon into a
>tight spinloop and it becomes useless.  If the child deaths are
>sequential, the daemon behaves properly.
>
>I've seen this behavior on cygwin 1.1.4 and 1.1.5-2.  Has anyone else
>seen this behavior and is there a fix for it?

No, and no.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -