Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 30 Oct 2000 05:10:36 -0330 (NST)
From:	Neil Zanella <nzanella AT cs DOT mun DOT ca>
To:	Thomas Dickey <dickey AT herndon4 DOT his DOT com>
cc:	Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>,
	ncurses <bug-ncurses AT gnu DOT org>
Subject:	Re: question about cygwin terminal type
In-Reply-To:	<20001029155045.E235@home.his.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.OSF.4.21.0010300507230.25527-100000@garfield.cs.mun.ca>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Thomas Dickey wrote:

> That's probably incorrect (cygwin's terminal emulator differs in several
> features that are normally in "ansi"), and is likely done to make it simple to
> setup on the remote host.  Just to satisfy my own curiousity I'll retest cygwin
> against "ansi" and see if I missed anything when making that terminfo entry.

Thanks. Too bad I can't make that terminal a little bit wider. That's
probably a limitation in Windows' shell client and I bet you they
did it on purpose. With Win2K you can maximize it vertically but you
still can't maximize the window horizontally.

> SIGWINCH isn't related to the $TERM value (it's whether or not your
> host supports the negotiations about window size)

Does Win2K support SIGWINCH?

Thanks,

Neil


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -