Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sat, 28 Oct 2000 11:52:56 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: So, has anyone *tried* the new gcc test release?
Message-ID:	<20001028115256.A30509@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
References:	<20001028000646 DOT A25472 AT redhat DOT com> <000501c040df$5c7db200$6037ba8c AT nhv>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To:	<000501c040df$5c7db200$6037ba8c@nhv>; from nhv@cape.com on Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 09:02:31AM -0400

On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 09:02:31AM -0400, Norman Vine wrote:
>>Where are all of the "Yay! It fixes everything!" or "This doesn't work
>>for me!" comments?
>>
>>Has anyone tried this?
>
>I have been using this and I can say
>
>This does not appear to break anything
>and seems to work just fine. :-)
>
>However I haven't gone back and reinstalled all of the problem
>packages that I had manually fixed inorder to rigorously test this.
>
>I have tried a few test cases and they worked fine where
>the earlier release doesn't.
>
>However due to my limited testing I am hesitant to proclaim
>Yay, This fixes everything :-))
>
>But I can say 
>Yay -- This is a GREAT Improvement !!.

Thank you for the feedback!  If I don't hear anything bad about this
by Monday, I'll make it the default gcc release.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -