Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<39F07B55.F7187D71@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Fri, 20 Oct 2000 13:05:25 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.7 sun4u)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	John Pollock <jpollock AT curl DOT com>
CC:	"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>,
	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: new sh doesn't translate Unix-style paths for Perl?
References:	<NEBBJPGNBOKKDAEIIMIKGEDNCCAA DOT jpollock AT curl DOT com>

FYI, Geoff Hart contribed a stub executable to assist in running
ActiveState perl from cygwin.  It is provided as-is, but it may help
your situation:

http://cygutils.netpedia.net/unversioned/perl-contrib/index.html

--Chuck


John Pollock wrote:
> 
> >Does it work in bash?  Was your old "sh" ash or bash?
> 
> Our old "sh" was ash.  To answer the other points, i understand that
> ActiveState Perl may not be properly parsing the paths, but the old sh
> appeared to do some sort of translation on its behalf.  Switching to a
> different version of Perl at this point is going to be difficult for us, so
> i was hoping to be able to use the new sh without losing any of the previous
> functionality.  And i'm still not sure i understand why ./ invocations of
> Perl scripts don't work with the new sh, as they did with the old.
> 
> One of my motivations for trying to use the new sh is that we've been seeing
> a lot of "Can't send signal 20" errors and make segmentation faults since we
> upgraded from b20 to v1.1.4 (we're at the very latest version as of
> yesterday), but we hadn't upgraded sh because of some of the issues like the
> one above.  I was hoping that upgrading sh (which is invoked by make) might
> lessen some of these problems, but perhaps that wouldn't happen anyway.
> 
> I appreciate all the feedback so far!  Thanks all!
> John
> 
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -