Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Envelope-Sender-Is:	Andrej DOT Borsenkow AT mow DOT siemens DOT ru (at relayer goliath.siemens.de)
From:	"Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej DOT Borsenkow AT mow DOT siemens DOT ru>
To:	"Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej DOT Borsenkow AT mow DOT siemens DOT ru>, <dwsharp AT iee DOT org>,
	"gnuwin32" <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Why does ls report some directory dates as future?
Date:	Fri, 20 Oct 2000 20:06:57 +0400
Message-ID:	<000201c03aaf$c597ed90$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance:	Normal
In-Reply-To:	<000001c03aaa$aa639c40$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

>
> The only comment is that all directories with wrong time are mount
> points, and
> they point to the FAT drives (root directory of FAT drives to be precise). I
> cannot reproduce it with the same snapshot under Win2k with NTFS. If I mount
> d: on /dosd I get correct time. That agrees with your output where
> NTFS drives
> do not have this problem.
>
> So, it smells like Cygwin bug.
>

OTOH does root of FAT drive have any associated time at all? Probably, not.

-andrej


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -