delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
From: | "John Pollock" <jpollock AT curl DOT com> |
To: | "Bob McGowan" <rmcgowan AT veritas DOT com> |
Cc: | <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com> |
Subject: | RE: echo with sh.exe doesn't understand multiple parameters |
Date: | Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:43:45 -0400 |
Message-ID: | <NEBBJPGNBOKKDAEIIMIKOEDKCCAA.jpollock@curl.com> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 (Normal) |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) |
Importance: | Normal |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 |
In-Reply-To: | <39EF56DB.5CA9CB9@veritas.com> |
Thanks Bob and others who responded. FWIW, sh on Linux accepts -e and -n at the same time, which is how we managed to run into our trouble (we do concurrent builds on Linux and Windows). But i'll be changing our -e -n references to use -e and \c. Thanks! John -----Original Message----- From: Bob McGowan [mailto:rmcgowan AT veritas DOT com] Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 4:18 PM To: John Pollock Subject: Re: echo with sh.exe doesn't understand multiple parameters These are mutually exclusive options. The -n makes echo emulate the old Bourne shell behavior, -e the new. echo -n test and echo -e 'test\c' Are equivalent. The other backslash sequences recognized when -e is used had no equivalent in older shells. You had to embed litteral characters, where possible. Hope this helps. John Pollock wrote: > > With the echo command, using -n or -e alone with sh works fine: > > $ echo -e blah > blah > $ echo -n blah > blah$ > > but when you try to use both flags at once, sh seems to get confused: > > blah$ echo -n -e blah > -e blah$ > > Is there a workaround? > > John > > -- > Want to unsubscribe from this list? > Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com -- Bob McGowan Staff Software Quality Engineer VERITAS Software rmcgowan AT veritas DOT com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |