Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/10/19/13:32:20
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 06:07:23AM -0700, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>--- Chris Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 10:14:57PM +0100, David Starks-Browning wrote:
>> >Wait, I'm confused now. Red Hat will ship with the environment
>> >variable MAKE_MODE=win32 set? Or will ship a version of make where
>> >--win32 behavior is the default?
>>
>> The latter.
>
>Would it help if we voiced complaint somewhere within Redhat? What
>reasoning is behind this?
The reasoning is that we have customers who are used to MAKE_MODE=win32
and rely on it.
One of our biggest customers uses make, gcc, etc. only as a native
windows solution. They don't care about mount tables or cygwin at all.
They want to be able to say:
d:\foo\bar.exe :
gcc -o d:\foo\bar.exe c:\bob\sproing.c
and not have to worry about specifying MAKE_MODE=win32.
Complaining to Red Hat wouldn't help with this. There is too much
entrenched use of the win32 stuff with the old Cygnus customers. I
believe that eCos might even use it in their makefiles, in fact.
cgf
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
- Raw text -