Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id:	<4.3.1.2.20001019112654.020041a0@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Sender:	lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date:	Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:28:26 -0400
To:	stefan <stefan AT lkcc DOT org>,
	Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
From:	"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
Subject:	Re: broken patch program
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.LNX.4.10.10010191549001.438-100000@bono.reversers.net
	>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 09:53 AM 10/19/2000, stefan wrote:
>Hello Cygwin'ers
>
>is it known to you that `patch' does not apply `diff's output in most
>cases ? It always looks like this.
>
>  .
>  .
>  .
>patching file `gdbm-1.8.0/gdbmerrno.c'
>assertion "hunk" failed: file "/src/patch/patch.c", line 334
>       0 [sig] PATCH 1001 stackdump: Dumping stack trace to
>PATCH.EXE.stackdump
>Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
>I was using the latest net release "shipped" with cygwin 1.1.4. But i
>noticed this problem all he time i am using cygwin. That is why i got used
>to use `diff' but `patch' on my linux box.
>
>stefan AT lkcc DOT org
>


This is news to me, and I've used patch with some regularity since b19...




Larry Hall                              lhall AT rfk DOT com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      http://www.rfk.com
118 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746                     (508) 893-9889 - FAX


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -