delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/10/18/09:59:09

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:58:29 +0100
Message-ID: <4362-Wed18Oct2000145829+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: emacs 20.7.1 (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I);
VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.1
From: David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Reply-To fun

Greetings,

It seems that more and more people (and not just those at cygnus.com)
are using "Reply-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com" to avoid getting
personal replies to messages they post here.

I won't comment on the appropriateness of that (though I do hold an
opinion...), but in light of this development, I would ask that people
check address headers when they reply to this list, and delete
duplicate entries for cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com (or equivalent).

It's bad enough getting just one of everything!

Thanks,
David



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019