Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Importance:	Normal
Subject:	Re: gdb/CYGWIN
To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Mailer:	Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3 (Intl) 21 March 2000
Message-ID:	<OFDE65ACC9.D3F6BAB3-ON8525697B.00647E48@raleigh.ibm.com>
From:	"Ed Bradford/Raleigh/IBM" <egb AT us DOT ibm DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Oct 2000 14:19:43 -0400
X-MIMETrack:	Serialize by Router on D04NMS90/04/M/IBM(Release 5.0.3 (Intl)|21 March 2000) at
	10/17/2000 02:19:41 PM
MIME-Version:	1.0

I believe some small issues with flushing could cause the
strange disassemble output I see.

It doesn't explain why I cannot single step into a non-gcc compiled dll. At
least the instructions
should be printable if not the procnames. Is there any understanding of
this issue?

Ed

Your Windows 2000 Arborist
T/L 589-4410; Outside: 1-919-993-4410
egb AT us DOT ibm DOT com


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -