Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<39E7A3C0.A50DD6F2@SunyataSystems.Com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 20:07:28 -0400
From:	"Laurence F. Wood" <LaurenceWood AT SunyataSystems DOT Com>
Organization:	Sunyata Systems Corporation
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Chris Abbey <cabbey AT chartermi DOT net>
CC:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin Performance Info
References:	<4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 0 DOT 20001013184237 DOT 00b6cd70 AT pop DOT bresnanlink DOT net>

--------------6AF426A2C47D16DA9342045F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

From your response it sounds like if I have a compute bound application, i.e.
one that does not make system calls, there is no hit.  However, what about
memory allocation and deallocation?

Chris Abbey wrote:

> At 19:23 10/13/00 -0400, Laurence F. Wood wrote:
> >Can someone tell me where the performance hit is in cygwin unix
> >emulation?
>
> whichever part you use the most inside your tightest inner loop.
>
> seriously.
>
> that's a big huge open ended question (not about cygwin, about ANY
> library/platform) that is as specific to your application as you can
> get. For example, if you spend 75% of your computing day manipulating
> text files and piping them and greping them and running file utils
> against them then the cr/lf translation may be a big hit for you.
> On the otherhand if most of your computation in a day is spent answering
> requests that come in on tcp/ip sockets then the remapping of winsock
> to netinet.h functions maybe your major headache. (note, I'm not trying
> to imply that either function has a performance problem, merely that they
> would be representative places that would have high invocation counts
> in the course of the given activity.)
>
> To really answer that for your application/workload then you need to
> get some form of performance detailing that can tell you how much time
> you are spending in any given method and how often it's called.
>
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

--------------6AF426A2C47D16DA9342045F
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
 name="LaurenceWood.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Laurence F. Wood
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="LaurenceWood.vcf"

begin:vcard 
n:Wood;Laurence
tel;fax:732-701-9748
tel;work:732-701-9746
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.sunyatasystems.com
org:Sunyata Systems Corporation
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:LaurenceWood AT SunyataSystems DOT com
title:Chief Science Officer
fn:Laurence
end:vcard


--------------6AF426A2C47D16DA9342045F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
--------------6AF426A2C47D16DA9342045F--

- Raw text -