Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 16:43:55 -0400
To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: Two snapshot bugs
Message-ID:	<20001013164355.D1492@cygnus.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
References:	<779F20BCCE5AD31186A50008C75D99791717B7 AT silldn_mail1 DOT sanwaint DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To:	<779F20BCCE5AD31186A50008C75D99791717B7@silldn_mail1.sanwaint.com>; from EFifer@sanwaint.com on Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 04:13:12PM +0100

On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 04:13:12PM +0100, Fifer, Eric wrote:
>
>I found something that changed from 1.1.4 to 1.1.5s (Oct-10).
>
>In some old code I had been careful to free memory from environment
>variables that were unset, but now the free() triggers a SEGV.
>Is this a bug or should I be doing something differently?

environment variables are not guaranteed to have been allocated with
malloc.  This is consistent with UNIX, AFAIK.  It was a deliberate
change in cygwin.  There should be a ChangeLog entry for this.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -