Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 15:25:02 -0400
Message-Id:	<200010131925.PAA21459@envy.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	RFC: linux compatibility

One of the ongoing discussions about cygwin is which "unix" to be
compatible with.  There are a number of specifications (ansi, posix,
x/open etc) and reference platforms (solaris, linux, etc) to choose
from.

Given that Cygnus (official sponsors of Cygwin) has recently been
acquired by Red Hat (leading Linux company), I would like to propose
that the target compatibility reference be Linux.  Note I didn't say
"Red Hat Linux" although that's the only Linux *I* have ;-)

Being compatible with Linux has a number of options:

* We can avoid lengthy discussions about what to be compatible with.

* Applications that run on Linux can more easily be ported to Cygwin.

* The Red Hat Cygwin group is much more likely to get official support :)

This, of course, doesn't mean we're giving up any of the
cygwin-specific stuff (mount tables, crlf handling, etc).  A specific
example of something that would change is the handling of the
time/timezone API, which is currently SYSV-style whereas Linux is
BSD-style.

At this point I'd like to ask for feedback about this idea.  Please
don't turn it into a holy war - facts are good, guesses are bad.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -