delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Message-ID: | <008001c034b7$42d15b10$63ec85ce@timayum4srqln4> |
From: | "Tim Prince" <tprince AT computer DOT org> |
To: | <lbv AT vanting DOT com>, <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
References: | <000001c03427$a2df0e70$0264a8c0 AT lbv2> |
Subject: | Re: Cygwin W2K compatible? |
Date: | Thu, 12 Oct 2000 18:45:20 -0700 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 |
Yes, cygwin has been working best for me on W2K for 15 months now, and I have them running on my T20 as well as on this old W95 box. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lars Bo Vanting" <lbv AT vanting DOT com> To: <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 1:37 AM Subject: Cygwin W2K compatible? > Hi! > > Just a quick question, as I'm afraid to corrupt my newly installed Windows > 2000. I've been running Cygwin on my NT4 and wants to install it on my W2K > labtop too. I cannot find W2K mentioned anywhere, is it supported? > > Thanks in advance! > > Kind regards > > Lars Bo Vanting > Senior System Consultant > ICON Medialab Switzerland Mobile Voice: +41 (0) 79 691 7487 > Uferstrasse 90 Mobile Fax: +41 (0) 86 79 691 7487 > CH-4057 Basel -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |