Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 12 Oct 2000 16:19:57 -0400
Message-Id:	<200010122019.QAA21289@envy.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	rmcgowan AT veritas DOT com
CC:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
In-reply-to:	<39E61B8C.277634E2@veritas.com> (message from Bob McGowan on Thu,
	12 Oct 2000 13:14:04 -0700)
Subject:	Re: registry key values question
References:	<39E61B8C DOT 277634E2 AT veritas DOT com>

> Is there any significance to this key being there?

It's from the pre-1.0 cygwin (B19 etc), which stored mounts in a
completely different location.  Seeing such keys only means that the
machine once had B19 or so installed.  They can safely be deleted if
you no longer have older cygwins installed.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -