Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 11 Oct 2000 21:39:46 +0100
Message-ID:	<2443-Wed11Oct2000213946+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
X-Mailer:	21.1 (patch 7) "Biscayne" XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I);
	VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 7) "Biscayne" XEmacs Lucid
From:	David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	ps output format

Hi,

At the risk of sounding ungrateful...

Is there anything that can be done with ps output format before 1.1.5
is released?

This is what I'm used to (cygwin-1.1.4, this on NT, no ntsec):

starksb AT BRYCE$ uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-4.0 BRYCE 1.1.4(0.26/3/2) 2000-08-03 20:53 i686 unknown
starksb AT BRYCE$ ps -elf
    PID  PPID  PGID   WINPID  UID TTY    STIME COMMAND
   1538  1530  1538      306 1024   0 21:24:15 /usr/bin/ps.exe
   1000  1000  1000      154  500  -1   Oct  6 /usr/sbin/inetd.exe
   1001  1000  1000      155  500  -1   Oct  6 /usr/sbin/inetd.exe
   1529  1001  1000      281  500  -1 21:00:54 /usr/local/sbin/in.sshd.exe
   1530  1529  1530       81 1024   0 21:01:01 /usr/bin/bash.exe

This is what I get now (2000-10-08 snapshot, this on Win98):

starksb AT STARKSB-P$ uname -a
CYGWIN_98-4.10 STARKSB-P 1.1.5s(0.28/3/2) 2000-10-08 23:55 i586 unknown
starksb AT STARKSB-P$ ps -elf
     UID   PID  PPID TTY     STIME COMMAND
 starksb368619     1   0  21:00:45 /usr/local/BIN/RXVT
 starksb339975368619   1  21:00:47 /usr/bin/BASH
 starksb390891339975   1  21:00:52 /usr/local/BIN/RXVT
 starksb784599390891   2  21:00:52 /usr/bin/SSH
 starksb685567339975   1  21:25:42 /usr/bin/PS

(A bit hard on the eyes, not to mention awk!)

Sorry to compare NT against Win98, in case that's a factor, but that's
all I got to work with right now.

Thanks,
David


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -