delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
From: | Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> |
Date: | Wed, 11 Oct 2000 15:36:24 -0400 |
To: | "Cygwin Mailing List (E-mail)" <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Two snapshot bugs |
Message-ID: | <20001011153624.B12484@cygnus.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | "Cygwin Mailing List (E-mail)" <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
References: | <002001c033b2$5f06cb90$1d01a8c0 AT BRAEMARINC DOT COM> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.6i |
In-Reply-To: | <002001c033b2$5f06cb90$1d01a8c0@BRAEMARINC.COM>; from tiberius@braemarinc.com on Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 01:37:54PM -0500 |
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 01:37:54PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >cgf wrote: > >> How long does it take before bash exits? Can you get it to exit in >> 20 repetitions of something simple like /bin/pwd? > >Right now I'm using the 10/10 snapshot. I cannot get it to logout after >over a hundred pwd's, or ls's for that matter. But it did 'auto-logout' on >me about a half hour ago, when I ran notepad from the bash prompt. Running >notepad now several times did not cause any logouts. > >One of them real fun ones, huh? ;-( Oh yeah, this is really fun. The fact that it has improved in 10/8 should be a clue but so far I'm to dense to figure out the clue. Anyway, I'd be deliriously happy if I could see it fail even once. >Haven't done enough yet today to tell if the '100% usage' thing is still >there. It was pretty bad in the 10/8 snapshot. I'm going to try a >cross-compile of GCC which is sure to make it show up if it's still there... I don't expect it to have changed in the 10/10 snapshot unless Corinna's changes did something, which is doubtful since she wasn't trying to fix this problem. Corinna sent me a gdb trace of a process in this state but it wasn't useful, unfortunately. I'm thinking of buying a new computer to test this. Mine are obviously charmed. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |