Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<80575AFA5F0DD31197CE00805F650D7602CDC6@wilber.adroit.com>
From:	"Robinow, David" <drobinow AT dayton DOT adroit DOT com>
To:	"'cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com'" <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Two snapshot bugs
Date:	Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:37:27 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)

> So 'getcwd (NULL, -1)' should return something but 'getcwd 
> (NULL, 0)', IMO,
> should not.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <errno.h>
int main()
{
   char *dir = getcwd(NULL, 0);
   perror("Error =");
   printf("getcwd=%s\n", dir);

}
 Sets EINVAL in Irix.
 Sets EINVAL in SunOS 5.6
 Looks like "getcwd" returns the right thing.  Should errno be set?

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -