Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<GYx2rOIEe145EwMy@wookie.demon.co.uk>
Date:	Tue, 10 Oct 2000 18:53:08 +0100
To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From:	John Beardmore <wookie AT wookie DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Subject:	Alpha CPU
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Turnpike Integrated Version 5.00 U <F7naP4S4l2F1q+EHsIexcg5ozp>

Has cygwin been ported to run under NT 4 on the Alpha processors ?

If not, what would I need to do a port ?


I've been given a couple of 2100 servers and was thinking of running
Linux on them, but it sounds as if Linux isn't rock solid with multiple
processors under Sable architecture.

I'm wondering if I might get best use of these boxes by leaving NT in
place as an abstraction layer to use both CPUs, while giving me an
environment that can run most Linux apps ?

To what extent does the cygwin dll offer a unix kernel style api ?  I
assume Linux executables can't be persuaded to run under cygwin without
some recompilation ?


Cheers, J/.
-- 
John Beardmore

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -