Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: Two snapshot bugs
References:	<000801c03285$ed6c49b0$21c9ca95 AT mow DOT siemens DOT ru>
Mime-Version:	1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
From:	Kazuhiro Fujieda <fujieda AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp>
Date:	10 Oct 2000 23:14:29 +0900
In-Reply-To:	"Andrej Borsenkow"'s message of Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:47:16 +0400
Message-ID:	<s1ssnq47ph6.fsf@jaist.ac.jp>
Lines:	13
X-Mailer:	Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34

>>> On Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:47:16 +0400
>>> "Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej DOT Borsenkow AT mow DOT siemens DOT ru> said:

> It is not command crashing. It is bash getting EOF sporadically and exiting.

I've experienced the same problem on recent snapshots and NT 4.0 Sp6a.
The standard input of bash seems to be sporadically closed just
after fork() or exec() is invoked. But I can't find the patter of usage
to duplicate this problem.
____
  | AIST      Kazuhiro Fujieda <fujieda AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp>
  | HOKURIKU  School of Information Science
o_/ 1990      Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -